bunisland4

Find an Asbestos Litigation Firm That Specializes in Mesothelioma For any legal matter it is best to partner with an attorney firm that is specialized in the area you require assistance with. A lawyer who only handles automobile accidents won't be able to handle a case with mesothelioma in it. Attorneys who specialize in mesothelioma and asbestos litigation cases have the experience and experience needed to help victims receive compensation. They will also be aware of the most recent laws and rulings in asbestos litigation. Levy Konigsberg LLP Levy Konigsberg LLP (“LK”) is a national asbestos litigation law firm that has offices in New York and New Jersey. Its lawyers have won multimillion-dollar settlements and verdicts on behalf of those suffering from asbestos cancer and mesothelioma in New York, California and Georgia and across the country. The attorneys also have dealt with cases which involved medical negligence and consumer fraud, product liability, and other types of fraud. In the last three decades, LK has represented victims of mesothelioma, asbestos-related diseases. Their lawyers have won many of the highest jury awards for victims, with some of the largest damage amounts ever. The firm's mesothelioma lawyers have also been successful in prosecuting several prominent lawsuits involving corporate wrongdoing and toxic exposure. The firm's mesothelioma attorneys are skilled in pursuing litigation against various companies involved in asbestos manufacturing and distribution. They include large corporations such as major construction companies and real estate owners. LK has also successfully sued asbestos producers in cases involving toxic contamination of industrial facilities and military sites. The firm represents clients in other personal injury cases as well as asbestos victims. This includes those who have been injured in accidents, car accidents, and medical malpractice. In some instances, the firm represents families who have lost loved ones due to medical negligence. Lawyers at Levy Konigsberg LLP have won numerous awards including Best Lawyer in America for Personal Injury Lawyers and Super Lawyers in Plaintiff Personal Injury. Additionally, Dayton asbestos lawsuit have been ranked as one of the top mesothelioma firms by U.S. News & World Report. Over the past 30 years, LK has pursued justice for thousands of people and women who have been diagnosed with asbestos-related illnesses. Their clients are mostly residents of Maryland and other states across the nation. The patients were exposed to toxic substances and suffered serious health issues, such as mesothelioma and lung cancer. Attorneys at LK are licensed to practice law in New York, New Jersey and federal district courts across the 50 states. Individual attorneys are also licensed to practice in other states depending on their experience and expertise in asbestos litigation. Waters Kraus & Paul If you or someone you love has been diagnosed with mesothelioma, it is essential to find an attorney who will help you get the amount of compensation you deserve. The mesothelioma attorneys at Waters Kraus & Paul have extensive experience in this complex legal area, and they are committed to helping their clients achieve the best possible results. They do not settle cases fast and work tirelessly to get the highest amount of compensation for their clients. The firm is a top law firm that has offices in Dallas, Texas; Los Angeles, California; and Moline, Illinois. The attorneys of the firm represent people from all 50 states, as well as several countries around the globe. They have recovered hundreds of millions of dollars in settlements and verdicts on behalf of their clients. They are also dedicated to defending victims of asbestos-related litigation and have been a member of many advisory committees. Peter Kraus is a founding partner of Waters Kraus & Paul and is a specialist in toxic tort, pharmaceutical injury and False Claims Act whistleblower cases. He has tried to verdict numerous asbestos, benzene, and pharmaceutical cases in state and federal court across the country. This includes the U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. He has also appeared before the Texas Legislature and Congress for asbestos victims. In the past asbestos plaintiffs' companies recruited patients suffering from asbestos-related diseases and bundled them up to file lawsuits together. These strategies were devised to overwhelm the courts and fraud defendants. After the adoption of Senate Bill 15 this practice is now largely banned across the nation and in Texas. In a recent lawsuit Garlock Sealing Technologies accused three Dallas plaintiff's law firms of “defrauding the company and concealing evidence.” However, Peter Kraus says this claim is absurd. Peter Kraus says Garlock's allegations are unsubstantiated and that none of his clients have been lying to Garlock. Waters Kraus & Paul lawyers believe that honesty is the best protection for their clients and their families. Weitz & Luxenberg Mesothelioma victims deserve a firm with the resources, perseverance and experience to secure fair compensation. Since its founding in 1986 the national law firm Weitz & Luxenberg helped asbestos victims receive billions of dollars in verdicts and settlements. The litigation teams, which include over 90 lawyers, are well-known for their savvy negotiation strategies and swift bargaining techniques. They will do everything possible to bring your case to an end quickly and efficiently. Mesothelioma can be a devastating illness that causes severe emotional, physical and financial difficulties for patients and their families. Exposure to asbestos can cause this cancer that can manifest and kill for years. Many companies put their profits ahead of worker safety and fail to inform the dangers of their products. People who worked with asbestos or in asbestos are at a greater risk of developing asbestos-related illnesses like mesothelioma or cancer. Workers ingested asbestos fibers into their homes in their clothing and on their skin. They then passed them to their family members. Asbestos sufferers can seek compensation for their illnesses from the companies that were responsible for their exposure. Weitz & Luxenberg is a firm with offices in New York, as well as across the United States. The firm's attorneys have assisted asbestos victims collect more than $17 billion in settlements and verdicts for their clients. The attorneys of the firm are committed to making the process as easy and as stress-free for mesothelioma patients as is possible. Asbestos-related litigation has gained attention in recent years and the firm is regarded as a leader in this field of law. The firm's founders, Perry Weitz and Arthur Luxenberg, have extensive experience in asbestos lawsuits. They have also secured some of the largest settlements ever seen in the history of mesothelioma lawsuits. The firm has a strong New York presence, and one of its earliest victories was a verdict of $75 million for 36 workers at the Brooklyn Navy Yard. In that case the jury granted a brake technician one of the largest verdicts for any single plaintiff. Venus Burns Leonard Sandoval and Josiah Parker are part of the legal team at Weitz & Luxenberg. James McWilliams was diagnosed with mesothelioma in the age of 81. The legal team won the verdict of $23 million in the trial. The verdict granted him $13 million to cover his pain and suffering in the past as well as $10 million for his future medical expenses. The team also won another $23 in a settlement for five former Jenkins Bros. Shipfitters. Judge Joan Madden consolidated the cases to increase pressure on defendants to settle. Chris Panatier Chris Panatier is a trial lawyer who represents victims of toxic exposures. His skills are evident both in the more than $150 million verdicts he has obtained for his clients and in the recognition he has received from his professional peers. His practice focuses solely on toxic torts, and he is well-versed in mesothelioma litigation and asbestos litigation. He also has a wealth of experience in pharmaceuticals, product liability commercial disputes, catastrophic personal injury and wrongful death. Asbestos, a poisonous mineral, can cause deadly illnesses like mesothelioma. The condition usually develops years after exposure, and it is difficult to determine. Asbestos exposure can manifest in various ways, such as mining, manufacturing and even home construction. However, the majority of cases involve asbestos exposure at the workplace. The state of California has many sites where asbestos was used in the past, such as factories and shipyards. These sites are usually contaminated with asbestos due to its fire-resistant and insulation properties. Sites that are polluted can also become breeding grounds for harmful bacteria and viruses. Asbestos is also found in water and soil. Although the majority of asbestos was removed from the air in the mid-1980s, contaminated sites remain a health threat for the general population. In the present, the state has strict environmental regulations to ensure the safety of residents and workers. Asbestos suits are complex and you should talk to an experienced mesothelioma lawyer. During closing arguments in the Johnson & Johnson talc trial Chris Panatier, an attorney, employed an Ice Cream Shop analogy to connect with jurors and make his points. The creative method helped him win a blockbuster verdict. He represented four plaintiffs who claimed J&J talc was responsible for the development of their mesothelioma. The jury gave $21.7 Million to Joanne Anderson, her husband and their children who were exposed asbestos through the baby powder manufactured by the company. The jury awarded $4 million in punitive damages. The family also filed suit against J&J's suppliers including Imerys SA and Honeywell International. Just a few blocks from J&J headquarters The jury handed down its verdict. The jury decided that the company knew about the dangers of asbestos in its talc, but failed to warn consumers. The plaintiffs' lawyer, Moshe Maimon of Levy Konigsberg in New York, and associate Christopher Panatier of Simon Greenstone Panatier in Dallas, argued that the company acted “maliciously or reckless disregard” for the plaintiffs' safety.